Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.26 seconds)
Emperor vs Panchkowri Dutt on 25 June, 1924 cites

Queen-Empress vs Nilmadhub Mitter on 7 June, 1888

A Pull Bench of this Court, in the case of Queen-Empress v. Nilmadhub Mitter (1888) I. L. R. 15 Calc. 595., expressed grave doubts whether a non-compliance with the provisions of Section 164 read with Section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code, could be cured under the provisions of Section 533 of the Criminal Procedure Code. It is not profitable to enter upon a discussion of this question as I am of opinion that Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in spite of the alteration that it has undergone by the amendment introduced by Act XVIII of 1923, does not apply to the confessions recorded in the present case. Sub-section 2 of Section 1 of the Code enacts that nothing contained in the Code, in the absence of any specific provision to the contrary, shall apply to the police in the town of Calcutta.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next