Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.35 seconds)Section 14 in The Architects Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
The Architects Act, 1972
P.U. Joshi & Ors., Union Of India & Ors vs The Accountant General, Ahmedabad, & ... on 19 December, 2002
13.Based on the statement of law in P.U. Joshi (supra), it is unambiguously clear that
the State is constitutionally empowered to frame such rules or amend any existing
body of rules, as the case may be, to regulate the conditions of service in relation to
cadres or categories of service, even if it affects the existing condition of service, at
the relevant point of time. However, what the Court needs to be mindful of is the
caveat that such power to frame such rules or amend existing rules should not take
away any 'accrued right' of existing employees serving on such affected posts, as the
new rules come into effect.
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
High Court Of Delhi & Anr vs A.K. Mahajan & Ors on 15 May, 2009
16. Yet, on a more extensive precedential analysis of this point of law post the
decision in A. K. Mahajan (supra), what emerges is the consistency in the law
laid down by the Supreme Court.
State Of Tripura & Ors vs Nikhil Ranjan Chakraborty & Ors on 20 January, 2017
17. The relevant paragraph from Nikhil Ranjan Chakraborty (supra) reads as
follows:
1