Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.35 seconds)

A2Z Infra Engineering Limited, Gurgaon vs Ccit- Central Circle-2, Faridabad on 28 March, 2023

16, since section 200A(1) (c) of the Act was introduced only with effect from 1-6-2015. Accordingly, any fee under Sec 234E could have been levied only prospectively, for periods beyond 01.06.2015, which is not the case of the case. Accordingly, the levy of fee on the assessee is invalid and thus, deserves to be deleted. It is submitted that no fee under Sec 234E of the Act can be levied before 01.6.2015. In this respect, reliance is placed on the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case True Blue Voice ITA Nos. 1596, 1597 & 1598/Del/2023 India (P.) Ltd. Vs CCIT, [2024] 158 taxmann.com 67 (Madras). Ld AR referred to following observations of Hon'ble High Court in this judgment.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 25 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Rajeev Kumar Singh, New Delhi vs Acit Circle-57(1), New Delhi on 27 November, 2019

6. We observe that similar view has been taken by the coordinate Bench of Delhi in the case of Rajeev Singh Vs. ACIT in ITA No.3681/Del/2017 by order dated 09.07.2021. Thus, respectfully following the above decision we hold that prior to 01.06.2015 no fee u/s.234E is leviable while processing the return u/s. 143(1) of the Act for the delay in filing TDS returns. Grounds raised by the assessee are allowed.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1