Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)Bishundeo Narain And Another vs Seogeni Rai And Jagernath on 4 May, 1951
14. After hearing the parties at length and perusing the records 1 am of the opinion that the present case fell within the ratio of the decisions in Bishundeo v. Seogeni Rai and in Ratnam Chettiar and others v. S.M. Kuppuswami Chettiar and Ors. , The evidence and circumstances of the case clearly show that every step in Partition Suit No. 237 of 1955 was taken by Ram Lagan Singh alone, who was the karta of the joint family, without the knowledge of either the father or grandfather of the present plaintiff.
Ratnam Chettiar & Ors vs S. M. Kuppuswami Chettiar & Ors on 18 September, 1975
14. After hearing the parties at length and perusing the records 1 am of the opinion that the present case fell within the ratio of the decisions in Bishundeo v. Seogeni Rai and in Ratnam Chettiar and others v. S.M. Kuppuswami Chettiar and Ors. , The evidence and circumstances of the case clearly show that every step in Partition Suit No. 237 of 1955 was taken by Ram Lagan Singh alone, who was the karta of the joint family, without the knowledge of either the father or grandfather of the present plaintiff.
Article 59 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 44 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
1