Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)N. Balakrishnan vs M. Krishnamurthy on 3 September, 1998
In the case of N. BALAKRISHNAN VS. M. KRISHNAMURTHY
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag & ... vs Mst. Katiji & Ors on 19 February, 1987
In the case of COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISTIION V. MST.
New India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Shanti Misra, Adult on 10 October, 1975
In NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS. SMT. SHANTI
MISRA - AIR 1976 SC 237. the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that
discretion given by section 5 should not be defined or crystallized
so as to convert a discretionary matter into a rigid rule of law. The
expression "sufficient cause" should receive a liberal construction.
Auto Centre vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. on 12 May, 2005
2. 278 ITR 291 (ALL)AUTO CENTRE VS. STATE OF UTTAR
PRADESH AND OTHERS
"In matters of condonation of delay a pragmatic view should be
taken and there should be a liberal approach. The law of limitation
is enshrined in the maxim interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (it
is for the general welfare that a period be put to litigation). Rules
of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of the parties,
rather the idea is that every legal remedy must be kept alive for a
legislatively fixed period of time.
Section 249 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
1