Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.55 seconds)
Deep Chand vs Devinder Parshad on 30 May, 2003 cites

Union Of India vs Ram Charan & Others on 30 April, 1963

20. Since the provisions under the Rent Act are summary in nature and only specific provisions of the Code have been made applicable by Section 16 of the Act, I am of the opinion that the rigorous provisions of Order XXII Rules 3(2) of the Code are not applicable to the revision filed under the Rent Act. The revisional Court has the inherent power to allow the legal representatives of a deceased petitioner to get themselves impleaded to pursue the revision petition. For that purpose, there is no limitation and the revision petition filed by an aggrieved party cannot be held to be abated merely because the application for impleading his legal representatives was filed after three years of his death. The decision cited by learned counsel for the respondent-landlord in Union of India v. Ram Charan (deceased) through his Legal Representatives, (supra) to the effect that the Court has no inherent power under Section 151 of the Code for the purposes of impleading the legal representatives of a deceased respondent, if the suit had abated on account of the appellant not taking appropriate steps within time to bring the legal representatives of the deceased, is not applicable to the present case, because in the said judgment the provisions of Order XXII of the Code were applicable as the appeal was filed under the Code.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 216 - R Dayal - Full Document
1   2 3 Next