Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.71 seconds)

Nandkishore Bramhe vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 May, 2019

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No. 32164/2019 (Nandkishore Bramhne Vs. State of M.P. through EOW) 7 procurement portal was with Antares Systems Ltd. and TCS. Applicant was the first person who complained regarding manipulation in tenders. It is further submitted that the only allegation against the applicant is that he provided VPN Access to other co-accused persons who manipulated the bid and thereby applicant is a part of a conspiracy, but there is no clinching evidence on record to show that it is the applicant who provided VPN access to other co-accused persons. There is no evidence on record to show that the applicant anyway connected with other co-accused person who manipulated the bids. Even, EOW had also conducted a search of the residential premises of the present applicant, but nothing objectionable was seized from his house. No unaccountable property or tainted money was seized by the Police from the possession of the applicant. Similarly, no other incriminating document was seized by the police from the possession of the applicant. Applicant is a Government servant. There is no likelihood of him absconding or tampering with the prosecution evidence. The Charge-sheet has been filed, applicant is in custody since 14/04/2019 and conclusion of trial will take time because the investigation regarding other co-accused persons is going on, so applicant be released on bail.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Dr.Kumud Shrivastava vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 April, 2012

In this regard he also placed reliance on Apex Court judgement passed in the case of State of U.P. through CBI Vs. Amarmani Tripathi, 2005 (8) SCC 21, State of Bihar Vs.Rajballav Prasad @ Rajballav Prasad Yadav, 2017 (2) SCC 178 and the judgement passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sudhir Sharma Vs. State of M.P., passed in M.Cr.C.No.1258/2015 vide order dated 30/10/2015.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 2218 - Full Document
1