Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.36 seconds)The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948
Regional Director, Employees' State ... vs Sundaram Clayton Ltd. And Ors. on 10 December, 2003
In the judgment of this Court reported in
Manu/TN/1930/2003 in the case of Regional Director,
Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Sundaram Clayton
Ltd and others) , it is held as follows;
Section 75 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 76 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Ncore Technology Pvt Ltd vs The Deputy Regional Director Esi ... on 6 February, 2010
(vi) The ESI Court, considering the evidence, held that the Mill
should have bifurcated the expenses incurred in respect of repairs to
building, machinery, generator, vehicle maintenance, stipend paid to
staff and apprentice , exgratia and wages, but in the absence of any
bifurcation of expenditure and wages, the above expenditures would
fall under the ambit of 'wage' and it is liable to pay the contribution as
http://www.judis.nic.in
4
per the judgment reported in 2012 LLR 1024 (Goa Bottling Co.Pvt.
Ltd., Vs. Dy. Regional Director, ESIC, Goa and others) and
thereby dismissed the petition.
Boc India Ltd. vs Assistant Regional Director, ... on 14 September, 2004
14. He has also relied on a judgment of the Andhrapradesh High
court reported in 2005 (1) LLN 726 (AP) reported in Boc India,
Ltd. (Formerly known as Indian Oxygen, Ltd) Vs. Assistant
Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation and
another), wherein, it is held as follows;
M/S.Sree Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd vs The Assistant Provident Fund ... on 20 September, 2010
9. The ESI Court relying on the judgment of the case reported in
http://www.judis.nic.in
7
2011 LLR 604 (Sree Mangayarkarasi Mills (P) Ltd., Madurai
District Vs. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
Madurai and another) has held that it is improper to engage 300
apprentices and 300 regular workmen who were equal in number and
non payment of contribution by the employer in respect of apprentices
is incorrect. Further the payment of stipend varies from time to time
and the quantum of stipend varies from person to person. The
contention of the ESI corporation that the management is liable to pay
contribution to the apprentices is held to be proper.
The Regional Provident Fund ... vs The Employees Provident Fund Appellate ... on 22 March, 2013
13.Learned counsel for the appellant has relied on the judgment
of this Court reported in 2015 LLR 1253 (Regional Provident Fund
Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation,
Madurai Vs. Employees' Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal,
New Delhi and another), wherein, it is held as follows;
1