Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.46 seconds)The Companies Act, 1956
Section 85 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 85 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Atul Mathur, Divisional Sales Manager ... vs Atul Kalra And Anr on 8 August, 1989
8. It is settled law that the scope of inquiry in a proceedings u/s 630 of
Companies Act, 1956 is extremely restricted in law and the case is to be
confined within those narrow ambit's without permitting any delay. The
provision contained in Section 630 has been purposely enacted by the
legislature with the object of providing a summary procedure for retrieving the
property of the company. It is the duty of the Court to place a broad and liberal
construction on the provisions in furtherance of the object and purpose of the
legislation which would suppress the mischief and advance the remedy. It was
held in "1989 (4) SC 514, Atul Mathur vs Atul Kalra and Another" that the
purpose of enacting Section 630 is to provide speedy relief to a company
when its property is wrongfully obtained or wrongfully withheld by an employee
or an exemployee.
The Railways Act, 1989
Sri S.K. Sarma vs Mahesh Kumar Verma on 17 September, 2002
In the case of "S.K. Sarma v. Mahesh Kumar Verma, AIR 2002 SC
3294 = 2002 AIR SCW 3827" the case pertained to Section 138 of Railways
Act which is somewhat similar to section 630 of the Companies Act and which
provides a procedure for summary delivery to railway administration, of
property, detained by a railway servant. It was observed as follows: