Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.21 seconds)
V.P.R.College Beedi Company vs Union Of India on 21 March, 2003 cites

Shyama Charan Agarwala & Sons vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 15 July, 2002

19. Of course, in M/s.P.M.PATEL & SONS V. UNION OF INDIA reported in AIR 1987 SC 447, the Apex Court has held that provisions of the Employees Provident Funds Act and the Schemes cannot be implemented at all in respect of the beedi industry. Even though the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, is a social welfare legislation, since I have already held that it may not be proper for this Court to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to go into the applicability of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, in the light of the ratio laid down in the decisions, referred to above, I do not propose to give any finding on this issue, as otherwise, it would prejudice the adjudication, which the petitioner may initiate before the Employees’ Insurance Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 19 - D P Mohapatra - Full Document

Basant Kumar Sarkar And Others vs Eagle Rolling Mills Ltd. And Others on 26 February, 1964

In view of the above well-settled principles laid down in the above cases that the Employees’ Insurance Court alone can go into the question, even as to the applicability of the provisions of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, I am of the considered opinion that it may not be proper for this Court to give a finding on that aspect.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 104 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document
1   2 Next