Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.16 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Mt. Sampato Kuer And Anr. vs Dulhin Mukha Debi And Ors. on 19 February, 1960
(10) We do not find any analogy between this case and that of Mt. S. Kuer v. D. M. Debi, . That was a case where a new right was derived by a mother under a settlement by her daughters. It was true that the mother made a gift of these properties to the daughters, but subsequently the daughters executed a document by and under which the mother was to be in possession of the lands during her life without any right of alienation by sale or mortgage. That situation does not obtain here, since, as we have already stated, it is in recognition of the pre-existing rights of maintenance that the land was given to the adoptive mother.
1