Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. And Anr vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 17 August, 1990
4. But we find considerable force in the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners that the condition imposed by the Deputy Commissioner that the purchaser must provide employment to the transferor or a member of his family, is without any legal backing. The said direction is beyond the purview of the permission contemplated under Section 49 of the Act. We are respectively in agreement with the ratio of the decision in Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. State of Bihar, 1999 (3) PLJR 15 in that regard.
Section 46 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Butu Prasad Khumbhar & Ors vs Steel Authority Of India Ltd. &Ors on 30 March, 1995
Therein, our learned brother has noticed the decision of the Supreme Court in Butu Prasad Kumhar and Ors. v. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors. (1995) Supp (2) SCC 225. We see no reason to disagree with the view adopted by our learned brother in that decision. Therefore, to the extent the Deputy Commissioner has directed that the purchaser should provide employment to the vendor or a member of the family, the same is found to be illegal and without jurisdiction. To that extent the communication issued by the Deputy Commissioner requires to be interfered with:
The Registration Act, 1908
1