cites: 1069365

1 - 5 of 5 (0.33 seconds)

Bharat Lal Baranwal vs Virendra Kumar Agarwal on 29 January, 2003 cites

Mohan Lal vs Jai Bhagwan on 23 March, 1988

Mohan Lal Vs. Jai Bhagwan (supra) was a case arising under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act 1973 wherein it was held that any purpose which is part of, or ancillary or allied to the original purpose will not amount to change of user.

Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 70 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Gurdial Batra vs Raj Kumar Jain on 18 July, 1989

In Gurdial Batra's case( supra), it was held that where shop was let out for repairing of cycle and rickshaws and was also used for selling of television sets would not amount to the change of user. The finding recorded by the High Court in the present case is as under:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 60 - M Rangnath - Full Document

Section 106 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 9257

Section 20 in The U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]

State of Uttar Pradesh - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 79

Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973

State of Haryana - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 578

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Mohan Lal vs Jai Bhagwan on 23 March, 1988

Gurdial Batra vs Raj Kumar Jain on 18 July, 1989

Section 106 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]

Section 20 in The U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 [Entire Act]

Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973