Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.33 seconds)Section 27 in The Gujarat Co-Operative Societies Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Gujarat Co-Operative Societies Act, 1961
Section 74C in The Gujarat Co-Operative Societies Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Maharaj Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Others on 2 November, 1976
60. Under the garb of being a necessary party, a
person cannot be permitted to make a case as that of
general public interest. A person having a remote
interest cannot be permitted to become a party in the
lis, as the person who wants to become a party in a case,
has to establish that he has a proprietary right which
has been or is threatened to be violated, for the reason
that a legal injury creates a remedial right in the injured
person. A person cannot be heard as a party unless he
answers the description of aggrieved party. ( Vide Adi
Pherozshah Gandhi v. Advocate General of Maharashtra,
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar, Maharaj Singh
v. State of U.P., Ghulam Qwadir v. Special Tribunal and
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba v. Tosiba Applicances Co.) The
High Court failed to appreciate that it was a case of
political rivalry. The case of the appellant has not been
considered in the correct perspective at all.
Ghulam Qadir vs Special Tribunal & Ors on 3 October, 2001
60. Under the garb of being a necessary party, a
person cannot be permitted to make a case as that of
general public interest. A person having a remote
interest cannot be permitted to become a party in the
lis, as the person who wants to become a party in a case,
has to establish that he has a proprietary right which
has been or is threatened to be violated, for the reason
that a legal injury creates a remedial right in the injured
person. A person cannot be heard as a party unless he
answers the description of aggrieved party. ( Vide Adi
Pherozshah Gandhi v. Advocate General of Maharashtra,
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar, Maharaj Singh
v. State of U.P., Ghulam Qwadir v. Special Tribunal and
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba v. Tosiba Applicances Co.) The
High Court failed to appreciate that it was a case of
political rivalry. The case of the appellant has not been
considered in the correct perspective at all.
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba vs Tosiba Appliances Co. & Ors on 16 May, 2008
60. Under the garb of being a necessary party, a
person cannot be permitted to make a case as that of
general public interest. A person having a remote
interest cannot be permitted to become a party in the
lis, as the person who wants to become a party in a case,
has to establish that he has a proprietary right which
has been or is threatened to be violated, for the reason
that a legal injury creates a remedial right in the injured
person. A person cannot be heard as a party unless he
answers the description of aggrieved party. ( Vide Adi
Pherozshah Gandhi v. Advocate General of Maharashtra,
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar, Maharaj Singh
v. State of U.P., Ghulam Qwadir v. Special Tribunal and
Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba v. Tosiba Applicances Co.) The
High Court failed to appreciate that it was a case of
political rivalry. The case of the appellant has not been
considered in the correct perspective at all.