Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.32 seconds)
Prithviraj Enterprises vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 28 June, 2021 cites

Jaysing Kewalsing Thakur vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 April, 2020

39. At this juncture it is pertinent to mention that learned Advocate General invited our attention to Writ Petition No.1879 of 2021 in the case of Sublime Warehousing Pvt. Ltd., through its Director - Shri Kapil s/o Lalsing Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 fled at the Nagpur Bench of this Court raising challenges similar to the ones raised in the present Petitions. He pointed out that by an order dated 08.06.2021, this Court by a reasoned order dismissed Writ Petition No.1879 of 2021. It is, therefore, his submission that on this ground alone the present Petitions deserve to be dismissed. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the decision in the case of Sublime Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. cannot have any bearing on the controversy raised in the present Petitions. It is pointed out that what was under challenge before the Nagpur Bench was Clause QC9 of the tender notice dated 19.05.2021. It is submitted that even the Nagpur Bench in paragraph 4 has observed that the Petition before it sought only quashing and 32/53 ::: Uploaded on - 29/06/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 29/06/2021 23:27:00 ::: 1 & 2. wp 750-21 & ors. & wpst 11311-21.odt setting aside of the tender notice dated 19.05.2021 and did not include any direction for quashing and setting aside of the G.R. dated 15.01.2021. It is thus the contention of the Petitioners that the decision of the Division Bench of this Court will not preclude the Petitioners from raising a challenge to the G.R. dated 15.01.2021 by way of the present Petitions.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10 - V K Jadhav - Full Document
1   2 Next