Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kerala vs Malayalam Plantation Ltd on 10 April, 1964
Can these expenses be said to be wholly or exclusively for the purpose of the business of the assessed ? The import of the expression for the purpose of the business" was considered by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-fax, Kerala v. Molayalam Plantation Ltd.. (1964) 53 I.T.R. 140 where it was observed at under : "THE expression "for the purpose of the business" is wider in scope than the expression "for the purpose of earning profits". Its range is wide: it may take in not only the day to day running of a business but also the rationalisation of its administration and modernisation of its machinery; it may include measures for the preservation of the business and for the protection of its assets and property from expropriation, coercive process or assertion of hostile title: it may also comprehend payment of statutory dues and taxes imposed as a pre-condition to commence or for the carrying on of a business; it may comprehend many other acts incidental to the carrying on of the business. How ever wide the meaning of the expression may be, its limits are implicit in it. The purpose shall be for the purpose of the business, that is to say, the expenditure incurred shall be for the carrying on of the business and the assessed shall incur it in his capacity as a person carrying on the business."