Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.46 seconds)

Union Of India vs Harnam Singh on 9 February, 1993

In Union of India v. Harnam Singh, (1993) 2 SCC 162, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that belated claims for correction of date of birth, particularly when raised at the fag end of service, are liable to be rejected. DoP&T vide O.M. dated 16.12.2014 has reiterated the instructions regarding alteration of date of birth of Government Servants, which stipulate that changes, if any, need to be sanctioned by Ministry or Departments of Central Government.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 448 - L M Sharma - Full Document

M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.& Ors vs Chhota Birsa Uranw on 25 April, 2014

"9. Thus, we do not find any logical reason put forth by the respondents authority not recording the date of birth in the Service Book of the applicant as per the Admit Card and the HSLC Passed Certificate. In our opinion, the decision of the respondents to retire the applicant on superannuation on 28.02.2014(by treating his date of birth as 05.02.1954) instead of 31.12.2014 is not sustainable in law. It is also noted that the respondents have given a good bye to the Admit Card and the HSLC Passed Certificate which were submitted at the time of appearing in the departmental examination for recruitment to the post of LDC and based on which he was appointed to the post being the requisite qualification. Further, for recording date of birth, the Matriculation Certificate is to be considered as genuine. The Hon'ble Apex Court in M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and others Vs. Chhota Birla Uranw, AIR 2014 SC 1975, it was held that: "........Certificate issued after joining service but on basis of school record containing date of birth- cannot be disregarded as one issued after joining service." In the said case, it was further held that: "Claim Reason: I am the author of this OA No. 40/72/2020 SOURAB document Location:
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 113 - P C Ghosh - Full Document

State Of Haryana vs Satish Kumar Mittal & Anr on 7 September, 2010

10. As regards the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Haryana Vs. Satis Kumar Mittal and another,(2010) 9 SCC 337, relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondents in support of her contention regarding limitation for making application for correction of date of birth, we are of the opinion that in the present case, the said decision is not applicable inasmuch as the Admit Card issued by the Board of Secondary Education, Assam, Guwahati and the HSLC Passed Certificate issued by the Principal, Government Boys' H.S. School, Silchar were submitted by the applicant at the time of his appointment to the post of LDC and were very much in the records of the Department. In our view, the mistake was committed by the respondents by not recording the actual date of birth in the Service Book.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 104 - Full Document
1   2 Next