Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.23 seconds)
Arasu Viraivu Pokkuvarathu Oozhiyar ... vs State Express Transport Corporation ... on 15 March, 2006
cites
Section 9A in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Premier Automobiles Ltd vs Kamlekar Shantaram Wadke Of Bombay & Ors on 26 August, 1975
d) In Premier Automobiles Limited v. Kamlekar Shantaram Wadke , the Supreme Court has held that it would need a very strong case indeed for the High Court to deviate from the principle that where a specific remedy is given by the statute, the person who insists upon such remedy can avail of the process as provided in that statute and in no other manner.
P. Pitchumani vs The Management Of Sri Chakra Tyres Ltd on 5 May, 2004
e) A Full Bench of this Court in the judgment reported in P. Pitchumani v. The Management of Sri Chakra Tyres Limited 2004(3) CTC 1 has held as follows:
Basant Kumar Sarkar And Others vs Eagle Rolling Mills Ltd. And Others on 26 February, 1964
f) In Basant Kumar Sarkar v. Eagle Rolling Mills Limited the Supreme Court has held as follows:
Rajasthan S.R.T.C vs Krishna Kant on 23 September, 1993
a) In Rajsthan SRTC v. Krishna Kant , the Supreme Court has observed as follows:
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Hindustan Steel Works Construction ... vs Hindustan Steel Works Construction ... on 10 February, 1995
c) The above judgments were quoted with approval by the Supreme Court in Hindustan Steel Works Constructions Limited v. Employees Union wherein it was held that a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution should not be entertained when the statutory remedy is available under the Act unless exceptional circumstances are made out.