Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.42 seconds)

Lakshminarayan Ram Gopaland Son Ltd vs The Government Of Hyderabad on 1 April, 1954

14. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the petitioner was only a servant of the Government and not an agent and that the Corporation merely receives only service charges as remuneration for the services and so cannot be called as an agent of the Central Government. He contended that the Food Corporation of India was only obeying instruction of the Government and distributing the fertilisers in accordance with the instructions of the master, the Central Government. He relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court in Lakshminarayan Ram Gopal & Sons Ltd. vs. Government of Hyderabad. In that case, the Supreme Court observed :
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 91 - N H Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 Next