Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)

The Official Liquidator Of M/S Kaizen ... vs Dayanand Madhav Mapuskar And Anr ... on 20 December, 2018

WP2605-17.DOC increase in the number of cases involving violation of the basics of judicial discipline. The learned Single Judges and Benches of the High Courts refuse to follow and accept the verdict and law laid down by coordinate and even larger Benches by citing minor difference in the facts as the ground for doing so. Therefore, it has become necessary to reiterate that disrespect to constitutional ethos and breach of discipline have grave impact on the credibility of judicial institution and encourages chance litigation. It must be remembered that predictability and certainty is an important hallmark of judicial jurisprudence developed in this country in last six decades and increase in the frequency of conflicting judgments of the superior judiciary will do incalculable harm to the system inasmuch as the courts at the grass roots will not be able to decide as to which of the judgments lay down the correct law and which one should be followed."

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd vs R. Santhakumar Velusamy & Ors on 6 September, 2011

37. A profitable reference, in this context, can be made to a judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar 27/32 ::: Uploaded on - 07/02/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 08/02/2019 00:52:52 ::: WP2605-17.DOC Nigam Limited vs. R. Santhkumari Velusamy and others, 2 wherein in the context of applicability of reservation, after a survey of the rulings relating to the promotion and upgradation, the following principles were expounded.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 75 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1