Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.40 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Metachem Industries on 1 September, 1999

18. The ld. CIT(A) has examined the facts and primarily on the ground that the partners were independently subjected to tax and they have confirmed the said introduction of capital in their capital account as per the statement recorded under section 131 of the Act and that the source was stated to be out of the inherited gold and silver hence following few case laws held that the firm could not be assessed in respect of the capital introduced by the said partners. Reliance was placed on several decisions namely - (1) CIT vs. Metachem Industries 245 ITR 160 (M.P) and (2) ACIT vs. Patel Rajesh Kumar Kantilal 64 TTJ 460.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 86 - A K Mathur - Full Document
1