Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.30 seconds)
Manjeet Kaur vs . Gian Singh &Anr. on 15 July, 2023 cites

Manjit Kaur vs Gian Singh And Ors on 27 September, 2022

20. Accordingly, in view of this legal settled position, let me advert to appreciation of the facts in the present case. As discussed above, the rate of rent for the suit property was Rs.6000/­ per month in the year 2016 and therefore, I am duly satisfied that suit premises being a commercial property could easily fetch the amount of Rs. 10,000/­ per month as rental value to the plaintiff during the period of unauthorized occupancy by the defendant and therefore, I am of the view that plaintiff is entitled for mesne profits @ Rs. 10,000/­ per month. As discussed above in the findings of Issue no.2, the tenancy Civil Suit No:­ 1083/17 (Vivek Kumar Agarwal) CJ­03/KKD/Delhi 17 MANJEET KAUR VS. GIAN SINGH &ANR.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - A Kshetarpal - Full Document

Jamila Begum (D) Thr. Lrs. vs Shami Mohd. on 14 December, 2018

13. The ownership of plaintiff in the suit property is established on the basis of registered sale deed i.e. Ex.PW1/2, execution of which is duly admitted by the defendants in the WS as well as in the cross examination of DW1 and DW2. The registered document certainly carries the presumption of its validity as argued by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff and as laid down in the judgment of Jamila (supra). The said presumption is rebuttable, however the defendants have failed to lead any evidence to rebut the said presumption, except making the bald averments. In the written arguments, plea is taken with respect to the ability of the mother of plaintiff and defendant no.1 Late Smt. Joginder Kaur to execute the said sale deed, however, no such pleadings have been made in the entire WS. As per Order VI Rule 4 CPC, if any party relies on the misrepresentation, fraud, breach of trust, willful default or undue influence, the particulars (with dates and items if necessary) have to be stated in the pleadings.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 30 - R Banumathi - Full Document
1   2 Next