Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.40 seconds)Section 2 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 96 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 115 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, ... vs M/S. Swaraj Developers & Ors on 17 April, 2003
25. It is essential to distinguish between the notion that an order
passed by a subordinate Court merges with an order passed by a Revisional
Court and the assertion that appeal and revision are the same. The Code
46
crafts separate and distinct provisions for both appeal and revision. It
cannot be said that the nature of exercise in revisional jurisdiction is the
same as of the appellate jurisdiction. The scope of revision and appeal has
been distinguished in a long line of Supreme Court judgments. [See: (2002)
3 SCC 626 (Harshavardhan Chokkani v. Bhupendra N. Patel), (2003) 6
SCC 659 (Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society v. Swaraj Developers),
AIR 1965 SC 1585 (State of Kerala v. K.M. Charia Abdulla and
Company), AIR 1963 SC 698 (Hari Shankar v. Rao Girdhari Lal
Chowdhury), (1965) 1 SCR 601 (State of Kerala v. K.M. Charia Abdulla
and Company), (1980) 4 SCC 259 (Sri Raja Lakshmi Dyeing Works v.
Rangaswamy Chettiar), (2003) 6 SCC 659 (Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing
Society, Nagpur v. Swaraj Developers), (2014) 9 SCC 78 (Hindustan
Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Dilbahar Singh) and (2019) 6 SCC
424 (Karnataka Housing Board v. K.A. Nagamani) ]