Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.40 seconds)

S. Kandaswamy Chettiar vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Anr on 12 December, 1984

In the case of Kandaswamy v. State of Tamil Nadu, reported at (2008) 11 SCC 97 where the accused was alleged to have indiscriminately cut the deceased with an Aruval (sharp sickle like weapon) resulting in his Crl.A. Nos.1461/2012, 503/2012 & 58/2012 Page 42 of 45 instantaneous death, the conviction under Section 302 was altered to one under Section 304, Part I of the Indian Penal Code, in the background of the legal principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in its earlier decisions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 40 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document

Alister Anthony Pareira vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 January, 2012

73. Section 304 consists of two parts, the first dealing with second degree culpable homicide and the second dealing with third degree culpable homicide as has been noted above. The distinction between 304 Part I and Part II has been drawn by the Supreme Court in the case of Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra, reported at (2012) 2 SCC 648, in the following words:
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 638 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next