Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)
Unknown vs Laiq Ram Dogra on 5 January, 2022 cites

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Laiq Ram Son Of Shri Bhim Dutt & Others on 1 December, 2015

Mr. Rupinder Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 8 & 11. None for respondents No.9 and 10, though served. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 8 and 11 submits that apart from the question of delay on merits also the appeal is liable to be dismissed because appeal filed in identical matter by the State being LPA No.12/2019, titled State of H.P. and others Vs. Laiq Ram Dogra, has already been dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.03.2021, relying on the earlier judgment passed in LPA No.79/2017, titled State of H.P. & others Vs Bhoop Ram, against which the Special Leave to Appeal(C) No.2373/2014 filed by the State in Raj Kumar's case has been dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the matter is covered by Vidya Devi Vs. State of H.P. & others decided on 08.01.2020, reported in (2020) 2 SCC 569.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Himachal Pradesh Housing And Urban ... vs Bhoop Ram on 18 September, 2015

Mr. Rupinder Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 8 & 11. None for respondents No.9 and 10, though served. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 8 and 11 submits that apart from the question of delay on merits also the appeal is liable to be dismissed because appeal filed in identical matter by the State being LPA No.12/2019, titled State of H.P. and others Vs. Laiq Ram Dogra, has already been dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.03.2021, relying on the earlier judgment passed in LPA No.79/2017, titled State of H.P. & others Vs Bhoop Ram, against which the Special Leave to Appeal(C) No.2373/2014 filed by the State in Raj Kumar's case has been dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the matter is covered by Vidya Devi Vs. State of H.P. & others decided on 08.01.2020, reported in (2020) 2 SCC 569.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Vidya Devi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 12 December, 2017

Mr. Rupinder Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 8 & 11. None for respondents No.9 and 10, though served. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 8 and 11 submits that apart from the question of delay on merits also the appeal is liable to be dismissed because appeal filed in identical matter by the State being LPA No.12/2019, titled State of H.P. and others Vs. Laiq Ram Dogra, has already been dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.03.2021, relying on the earlier judgment passed in LPA No.79/2017, titled State of H.P. & others Vs Bhoop Ram, against which the Special Leave to Appeal(C) No.2373/2014 filed by the State in Raj Kumar's case has been dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the matter is covered by Vidya Devi Vs. State of H.P. & others decided on 08.01.2020, reported in (2020) 2 SCC 569.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 61 - S Sharma - Full Document
1