Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh vs Randhir Singh & Ors on 29 March, 2010
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance
upon Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh v. Randhir Singh & Ors. 2010(2)
R.C.R.(Civil) 564 to contend that it was a co-parcenery property and
he was not challenging the sale deed and consequently he could not
be asked to pay the ad-valorem court fee. He, however, has no sound
argument to raise in so far as his plea regarding his status as a pauper
has been declined.