Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.24 seconds)
Sarlaben Kanaiyalal Desai vs Heirs Of Late Kusumben W/O Dolatram ... on 8 August, 2019 cites

Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr vs Rajendra Shankar Patil on 23 July, 2010

(d) The parameters of interference by High Courts in exercise of their power of superintendence have been repeatedly laid down by this Court. In this regard the High Court must be guided by the principles laid down by the Constitution Bench of this Court in Waryam Singh and the principles in Waryam Singh have been repeatedly followed by subsequent Constitution Benches and various other decisions of this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 2466 - Full Document

L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997

(i) The High Court's power of superintendence under Article 227 cannot be curtailed by any statute. It has been declared a part of the basic structure of the Constitution by the Constitution Bench of this Court in Page 8 of 10 Downloaded on : Fri Aug 09 22:55:03 IST 2019 C/SCA/13737/2019 ORDER L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and therefore abridgment by a constitutional amendment is also very doubtful.
Supreme Court of India Cites 86 - Cited by 2564 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

Surya Dev Rai vs Ram Chander Rai & Ors on 7 August, 2003

"6. In our view, the impugned order is liable to be set aside because while deciding the writ petition filed by the respondent the learned Single Judge ignored the limitations of the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. The parameters for exercise of power by the High Court under that Article were considered by the two Judge Bench of this Court in Surya Dev Rai vs. Ram Chander Rai and others (2003) 6 SCC 675. After considering various facets of the issue,the two Judge Bench culled out the following principles:
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 3621 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1