Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.48 seconds)Section 11 in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Registration Act, 1908
Section 10 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960
Ravindra Mutneja, Rajendra Mutneja, ... vs Bhavan Corporation A Partnership Firm, ... on 27 February, 2003
14. Mr. Khandeparkar submitted that even if the case of the
petitioners is taken at par and construed rather generously,
with reference to the recitles in the MOFA Agreement, it
becomes explicitly clear that the petitioners had agreed to
convey entire Plot "D" admeasuring 18,602.20 sq. mtrs. of land.
At best, it would be a case of the petitioners having failed to
construct a building on a portion of Plot "D" and that, according
to Mr. Khandeparkar, even if taken at par, does not furnish a
ground to defer the execution of conveyance. Mr. Khandeparkar
10/29
::: Uploaded on - 05/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 08/06/2023 08:58:19 :::
WP5230-2022.DOC
further submitted that the entire endeavour on the part of the
petitioners has been to obtain undue advantage of the change in
Development Control Regulations and derive benefit of the
enhanced development rights to the detriment of respondent
No.2 and its members. Such benefits, on account of change in
law, accrue to the Society and not the developer, submitted
Mr. Khandeparkar. To lend support to this submission
Mr. Khandeparkar placed reliance on the decisions of this Court
in the cases of Ravindra Mutenja and others vs. Bhavan
Corporation and others3 and Vidhi Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs.
Arenbee Media Consultants Limited4.