Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)Pioneer Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. And Anr., ... vs Union Of India And Ors. on 30 September, 1991
The distinction is obvious and when the law has been amended subsequently and when the aims and objects do not reflect that amendment as carried out is only by way of clarification, it has to be held that no provisions for confiscation and imposition of penalty in relation to the demands under Additional Duty of Excise (Goods of Special Importance ) Act, 1957 existed. This is the view taken by the Delhi High Court in Pioneer Silk Mills v. Union of India - 1991 (4) Delhi Lawyers 75, When the law has also been subsequently amended there is no reason to doubt the correctness of the judgment of the Delhi High Court.
1