Gagandeep Jindal vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 14 November, 2014
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that
insofar as the custom milling policy for the year 2013-14 is
concerned, it has been upheld by this Court in CWP No.21637 of
2013 titled as "Gagandeep Jindal Vs. State of Punjab and
others" decided on 14.11.2014 and has referred to another decision
VIVEK PAHWA
2016.01.11 16:46
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
High Court Chandigarh
CWP No.24330 of 2014 -3-
of this Court rendered in CWP No.20491 of 2014 titled as
"M/s G.N. General Mill Vs. State of Punjab and others" decided
on 14.11.2014 in which it has been held that the State cannot be
compelled to make the allotment in favour of a person, who was a
defaulter for whatever reason. It is further submitted by him that
two arbitration cases are pending against the petitioner in respect of
claim of recovery of `58,07,135/- with interest @ 13% per annum
pending before C.L. Bains, IAS (Retd.), Sole Arbitrator and recovery
of `11,23,089/- with interest @ 12% per annum before B.K.
Srivastva, IAS (Retd.), Sole Arbitrator, therefore, as per Clause
11-H(e) of the Policy, if an arbitration case is pending against the
miller then his case cannot be considered by the Government for the
purpose of allotment of rice mills.