Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.23 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ramjas Foundation & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 9 November, 2010
(Vide
Ramjas Foundation v. Union of India, K.R.
Srinivas v. R.M. Premchand and Noorduddin v.
Dr. K.L. Anand at SCC p. 249, para 9.)
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M/S S.J.S. Business Enterprises (P) Ltd vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 17 March, 2004
A.V. Papayya Sastry & Ors vs Government Of A.P. & Ors on 7 March, 2007
In A.V. Papayya Sastry v. Govt. of A.P.
[(2007) 4 SCC 221] the Court held that Article
136 does not confer a right of appeal on any party.
It confers discretion on this Court to grant leave to
appeal in appropriate cases. In other words, the
Constitution has not made the Supreme Court a
regular court of appeal or a court of error. This
Court only intervenes where justice, equity and
good conscience require such intervention.
Sunil Poddar & Ors vs Union Bank Of India on 8 January, 2008
In Sunil Poddar v. Union Bank of India
[(2008) 2 SCC 326] the Court held that while
exercising discretionary and equitable jurisdiction
under Article 136 of the Constitution, the facts and
circumstances of the case should be seen in their
entirety to find out if there is miscarriage of
justice. If the appellant has not come forward with
clean hands, has not candidly disclosed all the
facts that he is aware of and he intends to delay
the proceedings, then the Court will non-suit him
on the ground of contumacious conduct.
G.Jayashree & Ors vs Bhagwandas S.Patel & Ors on 19 December, 2008
The same rule was reiterated
in G. Jayashree v. Bhagwandas S. Patel]."
Bhaskar Laxman Jadhav & Ors vs Karamveer Kakasaheb Wagh Edu.Sty.& Ors on 11 December, 2012
The Supreme Court in the case of Bhaskar Laxman
Jadhav v. Karamveer Kakasaheb Wagh Education Society
reported in (2013) 11 SCC 531 has held as under :