Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.44 seconds)
Sree Gokulam Sizing Mills vs The Regional Provident Commissioner on 27 April, 2011 cites

Monotosh Saha vs Spl.Director,Enforcement ... on 21 August, 2008

45.Learned counsel for the appellant relied on a decision of this Court in Monotosh Saha Vs. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate and another (2008) 12 SCC 359. That was a decision entirely on different facts. In that decision Saha preferred an appeal before the appellate tribunal with a request for dispensing with requirement of pre-deposit, but the tribunal directed the deposit of 60% of the penalty amount before entertaining the appeal. When an appeal was preferred before the High Court under Section 35 of the FEMA, the same was dismissed by the High Court holding that no case for hardship was made out either before the tribunal or before it. In the background of those facts, this Court observed that since pursuant to this Court's interim order Rs.10 lacs have been deposited with the Directorate, the appellant was directed to furnish further such security as may be stipulated by the tribunal and directed that on such deposit tribunal is to hear the appeal without requiring further deposit."
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 19 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Pooran Mal Etc vs Director Of Inspection ... on 14 December, 1973

18. The Supreme Court vide its judgment in Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation) reported in (1974) 1 SCC 345 has held that materials gathered by illegal means cannot be rejected in an adjudication. The Supreme Court also made a distinction between an unlawful collection of material and the inadmissibility of evidence of such material in an adjudication.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 305 - D G Palekar - Full Document
1   2 Next