Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.27 seconds)
Prem Narayan Gwal vs The State Of Mp on 31 January, 2020 cites

Prem Narayan Gwal vs The State Of Mp on 13 January, 2020

6.3 The second safeguard in Section 3 is that if the order is passed by District Magistrate or the Commissioner of Police then 8 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH WP.20490.2019 (Prem Narayan Gwal Vs. State of M.P. and others) the fact of the order having been made along with the grounds on which it was made should be forthwith reported to the State Government concerned and in case the State Government does not approve the said order of preventive detention within 12 days of its making then the same would lapse.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - S Nagu - Full Document

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Bhaurao Punjabrao Gawande on 3 March, 2008

5. Prolonged arguments were extended by learned counsel for the rival parties but this Court has to first address the core issue about the maintainability of this petition raised by counsel for the State that though the order of preventive detention has not been confirmed by the State but since the petitioner has not been arrested till date the statutory safeguards prescribed in Section 3 of NSA are not available to the petitioner to be availed. 5.1 The law in regard to challenge to an order of preventive detention at pre-detention stage is well settled by the Apex Court in "State of Maharashtra and others Vs. Bhaurao Punjabrao 4 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH WP.20490.2019 (Prem Narayan Gwal Vs. State of M.P. and others) Gawande [(2008) 3 SCC 613]" after following its earlier decision in "Additional Secretary to the Government of India and others Vs. Smt. Alka Subhash Gadia and another [1992 Supp. (1) SCC 496]", relevant extract of which is reproduced below:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 299 - C K Thakker - Full Document
1   2 3 Next