Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.03 seconds)

Deepak Verma vs Daya Nand on 1 July, 2019

Article 120 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides for a limitation of 90 days for filing of an application for substitution of the legal representatives of a deceased plaintiff/defendant. The question as to when the limitation as provided under Article 120 of the Limitation Act would begin to run and what would be the effect (Downloaded on 04/04/2023 at 08:23:52 PM) (3 of 5) [CFA-249/2009] of Order XXII Rule 10A, CPC for the purposes of limitation was under consideration by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Deepak Verma vs. Daya Nand; C.R.P. 183/2018 & CM APPL. 35871/2018 decided on 01.07.2019, wherein it was held as under "16. Although the CPC does not expressly provide for the consequences of non-compliance with Order XXII Rule 10 A of the CPC, at the very least, it is a factor to be taken into account while deciding whether or not delay in filing an application for setting aside abatement is justified. The provision does not, however, automatically extend the period of limitation provided under Articles 120 and 121 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 1 - P Jalan - Full Document
1