Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)Sunil Bhati @ Sunil Kumar Bhati vs State Of Punjab on 13 January, 2020
The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner, seeking regular bail in case FIR
No.420 dated 25.12.2019, under Sections 22/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS Act'), registered at
Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar (Rural).
[2]. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner relies upon the decisions of the
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in cases bearing CRM-M No.13685 of 2020
titled as "Sher Singh Vs. State of Punjab", passed on 15.06.2020,
CRM-M No.2831 of 2019 titled as "Sunil Bhati @ Sunil Kumar Bhati Vs.
State of Punjab", passed on 13.01.2020, CRM-M No.13732 of 2020 titled as
"Ricky Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh", passed on 16.06.2020 and
1 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 04-09-2020 02:01:19 :::
CRM-M-23632-2020 (O&M) -2-
CRM-M No.46998 of 2019 titled as "Harwinder Singh Vs. State of
Punjab", passed on 10.02.2020, in which the petitioners, from whom
Buprenorphine injections had been recovered, were nevertheless released on
bail, in view of the fact that they were not reported to be involved in any other
case under the NDPS Act, and also that on account of the existing COVID-19
pandemic, routine trial of the cases would take a longer time. In the present
case also, the petitioner is not reported to be involved in any other case under
the NDPS Act and challan against him has already been submitted after
completion of the investigation, although the trial is yet to commence.
[3]. As such, at this stage, in view of the extra ordinary situation
occasioned on account of the existing COVID-19 pandemic, the petitioner is
ordered to be released on regular bail to the satisfaction of the Ld. Trial
Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned, subject to the condition that the State shall
be at liberty to seek cancellation of the same, in case the petitioner is found to
be involved in any other case under the NDPS Act.
Tej Pal @ Ricky vs Union Territory Chandigarh on 26 February, 2019
The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner, seeking regular bail in case FIR
No.420 dated 25.12.2019, under Sections 22/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS Act'), registered at
Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar (Rural).
[2]. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner relies upon the decisions of the
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in cases bearing CRM-M No.13685 of 2020
titled as "Sher Singh Vs. State of Punjab", passed on 15.06.2020,
CRM-M No.2831 of 2019 titled as "Sunil Bhati @ Sunil Kumar Bhati Vs.
State of Punjab", passed on 13.01.2020, CRM-M No.13732 of 2020 titled as
"Ricky Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh", passed on 16.06.2020 and
1 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 04-09-2020 02:01:19 :::
CRM-M-23632-2020 (O&M) -2-
CRM-M No.46998 of 2019 titled as "Harwinder Singh Vs. State of
Punjab", passed on 10.02.2020, in which the petitioners, from whom
Buprenorphine injections had been recovered, were nevertheless released on
bail, in view of the fact that they were not reported to be involved in any other
case under the NDPS Act, and also that on account of the existing COVID-19
pandemic, routine trial of the cases would take a longer time. In the present
case also, the petitioner is not reported to be involved in any other case under
the NDPS Act and challan against him has already been submitted after
completion of the investigation, although the trial is yet to commence.
[3]. As such, at this stage, in view of the extra ordinary situation
occasioned on account of the existing COVID-19 pandemic, the petitioner is
ordered to be released on regular bail to the satisfaction of the Ld. Trial
Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned, subject to the condition that the State shall
be at liberty to seek cancellation of the same, in case the petitioner is found to
be involved in any other case under the NDPS Act.
Harwinder Singh@ Pinder And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 1 October, 2019
The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner, seeking regular bail in case FIR
No.420 dated 25.12.2019, under Sections 22/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS Act'), registered at
Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar (Rural).
[2]. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner relies upon the decisions of the
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in cases bearing CRM-M No.13685 of 2020
titled as "Sher Singh Vs. State of Punjab", passed on 15.06.2020,
CRM-M No.2831 of 2019 titled as "Sunil Bhati @ Sunil Kumar Bhati Vs.
State of Punjab", passed on 13.01.2020, CRM-M No.13732 of 2020 titled as
"Ricky Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh", passed on 16.06.2020 and
1 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 04-09-2020 02:01:19 :::
CRM-M-23632-2020 (O&M) -2-
CRM-M No.46998 of 2019 titled as "Harwinder Singh Vs. State of
Punjab", passed on 10.02.2020, in which the petitioners, from whom
Buprenorphine injections had been recovered, were nevertheless released on
bail, in view of the fact that they were not reported to be involved in any other
case under the NDPS Act, and also that on account of the existing COVID-19
pandemic, routine trial of the cases would take a longer time. In the present
case also, the petitioner is not reported to be involved in any other case under
the NDPS Act and challan against him has already been submitted after
completion of the investigation, although the trial is yet to commence.
[3]. As such, at this stage, in view of the extra ordinary situation
occasioned on account of the existing COVID-19 pandemic, the petitioner is
ordered to be released on regular bail to the satisfaction of the Ld. Trial
Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned, subject to the condition that the State shall
be at liberty to seek cancellation of the same, in case the petitioner is found to
be involved in any other case under the NDPS Act.
Section 22 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 61 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Bachan Singh, Sher Singh And Anr. And ... vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 16 August, 1982
The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner, seeking regular bail in case FIR
No.420 dated 25.12.2019, under Sections 22/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS Act'), registered at
Police Station Phillaur, District Jalandhar (Rural).
[2]. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner relies upon the decisions of the
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in cases bearing CRM-M No.13685 of 2020
titled as "Sher Singh Vs. State of Punjab", passed on 15.06.2020,
CRM-M No.2831 of 2019 titled as "Sunil Bhati @ Sunil Kumar Bhati Vs.
State of Punjab", passed on 13.01.2020, CRM-M No.13732 of 2020 titled as
"Ricky Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh", passed on 16.06.2020 and
1 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 04-09-2020 02:01:19 :::
CRM-M-23632-2020 (O&M) -2-
CRM-M No.46998 of 2019 titled as "Harwinder Singh Vs. State of
Punjab", passed on 10.02.2020, in which the petitioners, from whom
Buprenorphine injections had been recovered, were nevertheless released on
bail, in view of the fact that they were not reported to be involved in any other
case under the NDPS Act, and also that on account of the existing COVID-19
pandemic, routine trial of the cases would take a longer time. In the present
case also, the petitioner is not reported to be involved in any other case under
the NDPS Act and challan against him has already been submitted after
completion of the investigation, although the trial is yet to commence.
[3]. As such, at this stage, in view of the extra ordinary situation
occasioned on account of the existing COVID-19 pandemic, the petitioner is
ordered to be released on regular bail to the satisfaction of the Ld. Trial
Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned, subject to the condition that the State shall
be at liberty to seek cancellation of the same, in case the petitioner is found to
be involved in any other case under the NDPS Act.
Section 439 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1