Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.79 seconds)Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Baldev Singh Son Of Karam Singh And ... vs The State Of Punjab on 13 February, 2003
For sake of brevity, the facts are being extracted from
Criminal Revision No. 1707 of 2005 titled 'Baldev Ram vs. State of
Punjab'.
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Jaswinder Ram @ Bodha Son Of Sohan Lal R/O ... vs State Of Punjab on 22 February, 2013
Thus taking into consideration the judgment of Delhi High
Court in Joginder Lal Vs. State, 1998(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 192 as
well as judgment of this Court in Yadwinder Singh Vs. State of
Punjab, 2009(3) R.C.R. (Criminal), I am of the considered opinion,
the ends of justice would be met, if the conviction of the petitioners is
affirmed, however, sentence of the imprisonment is reduced to the
period already undergone.
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Gurmej Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab on 16 July, 1991
This order shall dispose of CRR No. 1707 of 2005, titled
'Baldev Ram vs. State of Punjab'; CRR No. 1708 of 2005, titled 'Joga
ANJAL GUPTA
2015.10.06 14:02
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
high court chandigarh
CRR No. 1707 of 2005 & other connected cases -2-
Singh vs. State of Punjab' and CRR No. 1709 of 2005, titled Gurmej
Singh vs. State of Punjab', as the controversy involved in all these
revision petitions is identical in nature, arising out of common FIR
No.134 dated 16.04.1987, under Sections 406, 420, 568, 471 and 120-B
of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Banga, District
Nawanshahr.
Yadwinder Singh vs Punjab Public Service Commission on 16 February, 2015
Thus taking into consideration the judgment of Delhi High
Court in Joginder Lal Vs. State, 1998(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 192 as
well as judgment of this Court in Yadwinder Singh Vs. State of
Punjab, 2009(3) R.C.R. (Criminal), I am of the considered opinion,
the ends of justice would be met, if the conviction of the petitioners is
affirmed, however, sentence of the imprisonment is reduced to the
period already undergone.
1