Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)
Jagraj Singh vs State Of Punjab on 17 April, 2012 cites

Bahadur Singh vs State Of Haryana on 17 February, 2010

It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been continuing in custody since 14.06.2010 and fatal injury has not been attributed to him, rather, injury attributed to him with stick was on non-vital part i.e. right shoulder. It has been further contended that complainant died after about 21 days of receiving the alleged injuries. He has also placed reliance upon Baljit Singh @ Gaggu Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 8; Bahadur Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2008 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 271; Sattey alias Satbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2008(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 794; Ran Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2004(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 580; Krishan Vs. State of Haryana 2001(1) R.C.R. CRM No.M-2858 of 2012 -3- (Criminal) 213; and Balvir Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2000(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 681.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 57 - A Kabir - Full Document

Satbir Singh And Ors vs State Of Haryana on 14 September, 2005

It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been continuing in custody since 14.06.2010 and fatal injury has not been attributed to him, rather, injury attributed to him with stick was on non-vital part i.e. right shoulder. It has been further contended that complainant died after about 21 days of receiving the alleged injuries. He has also placed reliance upon Baljit Singh @ Gaggu Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 8; Bahadur Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2008 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 271; Sattey alias Satbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2008(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 794; Ran Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2004(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 580; Krishan Vs. State of Haryana 2001(1) R.C.R. CRM No.M-2858 of 2012 -3- (Criminal) 213; and Balvir Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2000(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 681.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 220 - Full Document

Ran Singh Malik vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 13 February, 2002

It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been continuing in custody since 14.06.2010 and fatal injury has not been attributed to him, rather, injury attributed to him with stick was on non-vital part i.e. right shoulder. It has been further contended that complainant died after about 21 days of receiving the alleged injuries. He has also placed reliance upon Baljit Singh @ Gaggu Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 8; Bahadur Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2008 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 271; Sattey alias Satbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2008(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 794; Ran Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2004(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 580; Krishan Vs. State of Haryana 2001(1) R.C.R. CRM No.M-2858 of 2012 -3- (Criminal) 213; and Balvir Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2000(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 681.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 28 - R P Sethi - Full Document

Krishan Lal Gera vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 4 July, 2011

It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been continuing in custody since 14.06.2010 and fatal injury has not been attributed to him, rather, injury attributed to him with stick was on non-vital part i.e. right shoulder. It has been further contended that complainant died after about 21 days of receiving the alleged injuries. He has also placed reliance upon Baljit Singh @ Gaggu Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 8; Bahadur Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2008 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 271; Sattey alias Satbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2008(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 794; Ran Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2004(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 580; Krishan Vs. State of Haryana 2001(1) R.C.R. CRM No.M-2858 of 2012 -3- (Criminal) 213; and Balvir Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2000(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 681.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 282 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next