Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.37 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 304B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 113 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 498 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 207 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 August, 1973
It may be noted here that this Court indicated that the circumstances
concerned 'must or should' and not 'may be' established. There is not
only a grammatical but legal distinction between 'may be proved' and
'must be or should be proved' as was held by this Court in Shivaji
Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra (1973) 2 SCC 793 where
the following observations were made :
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
92.Hon'ble Supreme court in "Sharad Birdhichand Sarda V. State of Maharashtra,
(1984) 4 SCC 116" has laid down the parameters for arriving at an opinion in
regard to proof of a prosecution case on the basis of the circumstantial evidence,
stating: