cites: 108616263

1 - 10 of 30 (0.24 seconds)

M/S Vasanth Colour Laboratories Pvt ... vs Smt Divya on 22 January, 2016 cites

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 497050

Section 47 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 6623

Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 114387

Konchada Ramamurthy Subudhi & Anr vs Gopinath Naik on 7 December, 1967

19. Under identical circumstances, Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of KONCHADA RAMAMURTHY SUBUDHI AND ANOTHER vs GOPINATH NAIK reported in AIR 1968 SC 919, has held the intention of the parties in a compromise petition is a decisive test which will have to be adopted to ascertain as to whether parties intended to revive the tenancy or create new tenancy under compromise petition. It has been further held that in spite of the fact that word 'rent' being used in the compromise petition would not : 26 : be a ground to contend that it amounts to a fresh lease having been created. Hon'ble Apex Court therein was examining as to whether the compromise deed constitute creation of a lease or licence and held that when the decree holder has brought a suit for ejectment of the judgment debtor and a compromise being entered into in that suit, is important and it would be difficult to impute to such decree holder that he had intention to create a fresh tenancy while the fact that he brought the suit for ejectment itself shows that his intention was to eject the judgment debtor after having terminated the tenancy. Hence, contention raised by learned Advocate appearing for petitioner - judgment debtor in this regard stands rejected.

Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 38 - S M Sikri - Full Document

Board Of Trustees Of Port Of Mumbai vs Nikhil N Gupta on 23 April, 2015

24. Keeping the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court noticed herein above in mind, when the facts on hand are examined, the contents of the compromise petition

Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 3 - Cited by 387520

Air India Etc. Etc vs Nergesh Meerza & Ors. Etc. Etc on 28 August, 1981

TRIVENIBAI AND ANOTHER vs SMT.LILABAI (5) AIR 1979 SC 1745 V DHANAPAL CHETTIAR vs YESODAI AMMAL (6) AIR 2004 CALCUTTA 267 M/S.SARASWAT TRADING AGENCY vs UNION OF INDIA :8 : (7) AIR 2002 SC 251 N.S.S.NARAYANA SARMA AND OTHERS vs M/S.GOLDSTONE EXPORTS (P) LTD AND OTHERS (8) (2005)7 SCC 653 DEVASAHAYAM (DEAD) BY L.RS. vs P.SAVITHRAMMA AND OTHERS (9) AIR 1967 SC 155 GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI AND OTHERS vs MEENAKSHI AYAL AND OTHERS (10) AIR 1981 SC 1829 AIR INDIA vs NARGESH MEERZA AND OTHERS (11) AIR 1989 SC 1510 MODERN HOTEL, GUDUR,REP.

Supreme Court of India Cites 59 - Cited by 357 - S M Ali - Full Document

Modern Hotel, Gudur Represented Bym.N. ... vs K. Radhakrishnaiah & Ors on 26 April, 1989

BY M.N.NARAYANAN vs K.RADHAKRISHNAIAH AND OTHERS (12) (2007)6 SCC 401 M.VENKATARAMANA HEBBAR (DEAD) BY L.RS. vs M.RAJAGOPAL HEBBAR AND OTHERS (13) AIR 1994 ANDHRA PRADESH 197 PARUCHURU NARASIMHA RAO vs NUNE PANDU RANGA RAO AND ANOTHER (14) AIR 1982 BOMBAY 532 KALYANDAS MANILAL SHAH vs S.M.KANKARIA AND ANOTHER (15) AIR 1988 ALLAHABAD 225 UNION OF INDIA vs S.B.SINGH (16) AIR 1978 SC 22 SMT.NAI BAHU vs LALA RAMNARAYAN AND OTHERS :9 : (17) AIR 1977 SC 1201 SUNDER DASS vs RAM PARKASH (18) (1976)1 KAR.L.J. 35 PADMAVATHI BAI vs PARVATHIAMMA (19) (1994)3 SCC 375 THARUMAL AND ANOTHER vs MASJID HAJUM PHAROSAN VA MADRASSA TALIMUL ISLAM, MIRZA IZSMAIL ROAD, JAIPUR (20) JT 1993(2) S.C. 341 CHIRANJILAL SHRILAL GOENKA (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS. vs JASJIT SINGH & OTHERS

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 67 - M Rangnath - Full Document

M. Venkataramana Hebbar (D) By L.Rs vs M. Rajagopal Hebbar & Ors on 5 April, 2007

BY M.N.NARAYANAN vs K.RADHAKRISHNAIAH AND OTHERS (12) (2007)6 SCC 401 M.VENKATARAMANA HEBBAR (DEAD) BY L.RS. vs M.RAJAGOPAL HEBBAR AND OTHERS (13) AIR 1994 ANDHRA PRADESH 197 PARUCHURU NARASIMHA RAO vs NUNE PANDU RANGA RAO AND ANOTHER (14) AIR 1982 BOMBAY 532 KALYANDAS MANILAL SHAH vs S.M.KANKARIA AND ANOTHER (15) AIR 1988 ALLAHABAD 225 UNION OF INDIA vs S.B.SINGH (16) AIR 1978 SC 22 SMT.NAI BAHU vs LALA RAMNARAYAN AND OTHERS :9 : (17) AIR 1977 SC 1201 SUNDER DASS vs RAM PARKASH (18) (1976)1 KAR.L.J. 35 PADMAVATHI BAI vs PARVATHIAMMA (19) (1994)3 SCC 375 THARUMAL AND ANOTHER vs MASJID HAJUM PHAROSAN VA MADRASSA TALIMUL ISLAM, MIRZA IZSMAIL ROAD, JAIPUR (20) JT 1993(2) S.C. 341 CHIRANJILAL SHRILAL GOENKA (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS. vs JASJIT SINGH & OTHERS

Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 83 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Sunder Dass vs Ram Prakash on 24 February, 1977

BY M.N.NARAYANAN vs K.RADHAKRISHNAIAH AND OTHERS (12) (2007)6 SCC 401 M.VENKATARAMANA HEBBAR (DEAD) BY L.RS. vs M.RAJAGOPAL HEBBAR AND OTHERS (13) AIR 1994 ANDHRA PRADESH 197 PARUCHURU NARASIMHA RAO vs NUNE PANDU RANGA RAO AND ANOTHER (14) AIR 1982 BOMBAY 532 KALYANDAS MANILAL SHAH vs S.M.KANKARIA AND ANOTHER (15) AIR 1988 ALLAHABAD 225 UNION OF INDIA vs S.B.SINGH (16) AIR 1978 SC 22 SMT.NAI BAHU vs LALA RAMNARAYAN AND OTHERS :9 : (17) AIR 1977 SC 1201 SUNDER DASS vs RAM PARKASH (18) (1976)1 KAR.L.J. 35 PADMAVATHI BAI vs PARVATHIAMMA (19) (1994)3 SCC 375 THARUMAL AND ANOTHER vs MASJID HAJUM PHAROSAN VA MADRASSA TALIMUL ISLAM, MIRZA IZSMAIL ROAD, JAIPUR (20) JT 1993(2) S.C. 341 CHIRANJILAL SHRILAL GOENKA (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS. vs JASJIT SINGH & OTHERS

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 127 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

1 2 3 Next