Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.91 seconds)

Krishna Janardhan Bhat vs Dattatraya G. Hegde on 11 January, 2008

It is settled preposition of law that the guilt of accused must be proved beyond reasonable doubt and reliance has been placed by this court on the judgments of Bharat Barrel & Drum Manufacturing Company Vs. Amit Chand Payrelal [( 1999 ) 3 SCC 35]and of Krishna Janardhan Bhat v. Dattatraya G.Hegde(2008)4 SCC54 wherein it was held that "Furthermore, whereas CC No.136/1/08 Naveen Tyres V. Sunder 9 of 12 pages prosecution must prove the guilt of an accused beyond all reasonable doubt, the standard of proof so as to prove a defence on the part of an accused is preponderance of probabilities. Inference of preponderance of probabilities can be drawn not only from the materials brought on records by the parties but also by reference to the circumstances upon which he relies".
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 3978 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Bharat Barrel And Drum Manufacturing ... vs Amin Chand Payrelal on 18 February, 1999

It is settled preposition of law that the guilt of accused must be proved beyond reasonable doubt and reliance has been placed by this court on the judgments of Bharat Barrel & Drum Manufacturing Company Vs. Amit Chand Payrelal [( 1999 ) 3 SCC 35]and of Krishna Janardhan Bhat v. Dattatraya G.Hegde(2008)4 SCC54 wherein it was held that "Furthermore, whereas CC No.136/1/08 Naveen Tyres V. Sunder 9 of 12 pages prosecution must prove the guilt of an accused beyond all reasonable doubt, the standard of proof so as to prove a defence on the part of an accused is preponderance of probabilities. Inference of preponderance of probabilities can be drawn not only from the materials brought on records by the parties but also by reference to the circumstances upon which he relies".
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 1948 - Full Document
1   2 Next