Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.33 seconds)Section 23 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Bombay University Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Section 58 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 47 in Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Maharaja Sir Manindra Chandra Nandi vs Ram Kumar Bhagat on 3 April, 1922
It was observed by Lord Phillimore in Manindra Chandra v. Ram Kumar AIR 1922 PC 304, (306) (Col 2) that Order XXII contemplates only cases of devolution of interest from some original parly to the suit, whether plaintiff or defendant, upon someone else.
Monghibai vs Cooverji Umersey on 2 May, 1939
As observed by Lord Porter in Monghibai v. Cooverji Umersey. AIR 1939 PC 170 (173). "parties who have assigned the whole of their interest pendciite lite cannot ask for judgment in respect of an interest which is no longer theirs"'. The expression "by leave of the Court"1 vests the Court with a discretion in the mailer which is to be judicially exercised.
Nanjammal And Ors. vs Eswaramurthi Goundar, Minor By ... on 22 October, 1953
The mere fuel that an assignment is disputed is no ground for refusing leave -- Wright Neville v. Freser, AIR 1944 Nag 137 and Nanjammal v. Eswaramurthi, AIR 1954 Mad 592 (594). In the present case, it is not disputed that the sale transaction in favour of the applicants came into existence during the pendency of the suil. All the sale transactions are udmitted bv the respective vendors The applicants have also filed all the sale-deeds except in Application No. 167 of 1964 where it was stated by Shri V.K. Vaidya that the sale-deed has not been returned by the registering officer The entire right, title and interest of the vendor to a share in the suit properties has been conveyed under each sale-deed. It has to be borne in mind that the vendors, who are no longer interested in the properties to be allotted to their shares, may not object to any disadvantageous or prejudicial allotment of properties to their share.
Policherla Veeraraghava Reddi vs Cherla Subba Reddi (Died) And Ors. on 23 April, 1919
Veeraraghava Reddi v. Subba Reddi, ILR 43 Mad 37: (AIR 1920 Mad 391) (SB) and Shantil Lal v. Mukat Lal, 1944 42 All LJ 351: ILR 1944 All 350.