Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.66 seconds)
Sh. Suraj Singh S/O Sh. Babu Ram vs Ndmc on 24 January, 2011 cites

Ram Nath Suraj Singh Rishi Kum vs N.D.M.C & Anr. on 23 October, 2008

6. The defendant has been filed written statement/reply. It is replied that suit of the plaintiff not maintainable as the plaintiff has not approached the court with clean hands and concealed the material facts and the suit of the plaintiff is liable to be dismissed. It is further replied by the defendants that the present suit has been filed by the plaintiff without accruing any cause of action in his favour and failed to specify any cause of action in his favour hence, Sh. Suraj Singh Vs. N.D.M.C & others ( Suit No:138/10) Page 3 of 15 the suit is liable to be rejected in view of the provisions of oder VII rule 11 of CPC. It is replied by the defendant that the suit of plaintiff is not maintainable either under equity or under the law of land as the claim of the plaintiff is to be considered by Vending Committee and the suit is badly vitiated by suppression of material facts and stating of false facts, incorrect and misleading contentions without any documentary evidence, hence suit is liable to be dismissed. It is stated by the defendant that the present suit has been filed by the plaintiff on the basis of manipulated facts in order to encroach upon the public land. It is also replied by the defendant that the contents of the plaint are wrong, false and denied in totality.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - V Sanghi - Full Document

Sodan Singh vs N.D.M.C. & Ors on 4 February, 1998

In the meantime, another judgment in the name of Sodan Singh v. NDMC and Ors. (1998)2 SCC 727 was delivered which was in continuation of its two earlier judgments concerning the hawkers/squatters in the public streets in NDMC area. The Court considered the report of the Thareja Committee and came to the conclusion that occupation and places of eligible squatters, as decided by the Thareja Committee, is only tentative.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 38 - Full Document

Sh. I.P. Handa vs Ndmc on 6 July, 2009

16. The application before me relates to a poor vendor who has already applied to the appropriate authority through the Vending Committee and the matter remains still pending. I Sh. Suraj Singh Vs. N.D.M.C & others ( Suit No:138/10) Page 13 of 15 ought not comment on the functioning of the Vending Committee which has been constituted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. All that I can comment on is that the grievance of the plaintiff­ herein could only be addressed within the legal framework of the National Policy on Urban Vendors, 2009. It is for the government to take a policy decision. The progressive steps have already taken by the governments like Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - A Kumar - Full Document
1