Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.21 seconds)
Hanmant Bhaurao Suryawanshi And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 14 October, 2022 cites

Muzaffar Mahmood Haji Mahmood Khan vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 28 November, 2018

Further, reliance has been placed on the decision in Imran s/o Masood Khan and Anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr., [2019 ALL MR (Cri.) 2838], wherein it has been held that "in this case prosecution case was that deceased committed suicide by hanging at his own house allegedly due to persistent demand of money and threats of consequences by the applicants if demand not fulfilled. Deceased had taken hand loan from the applicants. In suicide note deceased implicated the applicants. He had lodged a non-cognizable offence against the applicants when wife and daughter of deceased were abused on account of interest on loan amount. When it was found that this incident was one month earlier to suicide, then there was an option for the deceased to set the (5) ::: Uploaded on - 14/10/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 15/10/2022 19:36:17 ::: appln-4275-2019.odt criminal law in motion rather than to commit suicide. Under such circumstance, it was held that even if the allegations in the FIR and the suicide note presumed to be correct, are not sufficient to take action against applicants and, therefore, the FIR was quashed."
Bombay High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Netai Dutta vs State Of West Bengal on 28 February, 2005

appln-4275-2019.odt Further, reliance has been placed on the decision in Netai Dutta Vs. State of West Bengal, [2005 AIR (SC) 1775], wherein it has been held that "in suicide note, no reference of any Act or incidence whereby the appellant is alleged to have committed any willful act or omission or intentionally aided or instigated the deceased in committing the act of suicide. There is no case that the appellant has played any part or any role in any conspiracy, which ultimately instigated or resulted in the commission of suicide by deceased. Under such circumstance, no ground has been made out to proceed against the appellant. Hence, the proceedings were quashed."
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 277 - T Chatterjee - Full Document

Madan Mohan Singh vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 17 August, 2010

4. He prayed for the quashment of the FIR and in order to buttress his submissions, he has relied on the decision in Madan Mohan Singh Vs. State of Gujarat and another, [(2010) 8 SCC 628], wherein it has been held that "intention of accused to aid or to instigate or to abet the suicide must be proved. Suicide note of deceased implicating appellant - accused was more in the nature of departmental complaint, suggesting some mental imbalance on part of deceased which he himself described as depression would not amount to abetment."
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 254 - V S Sirpurkar - Full Document
1   2 Next