Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.32 seconds)Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr on 18 January, 2005
In Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan (supra), this
Court categorically held that
"The High Court could not have allowed the bail application on
the sole ground of delay in the conclusion of the trial without
taking into consideration the allegation made by the prosecution
1 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1702
13
in regard to the existence of prima facie case, gravity of offence,
and the allegation of tampering with the witness by threat and
inducement when on bail. ... non-consideration of the same and
grant of bail solely on the ground of long incarceration vitiated
the order..."
Brijmani Devi vs Pappu Kumar on 17 December, 2021
In Brijmani Devi v. Pappu Kumar (supra), this Court held
that the possibility of the accused absconding or threatening
witnesses had a direct bearing on the fairness of the trial. In
serious offences, such apprehensions - when reasonably
supported by record - must weigh against the grant of bail.
Imran vs Mohammed Bhava on 22 April, 2022
In Imran v. Mohammed Bhava2, a three-Judge Bench of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court held as follows:
Vipan Kumar Dhir vs The State Of Punjab on 4 October, 2021
"23. Indeed, it is a well-established principle that once bail has
been granted it would require overwhelming circumstances for its
cancellation. However, this Court in its judgment in Vipan Kumar
Dhir v. State of Punjab has also reiterated, that while
conventionally, certain supervening circumstances
impeding fair trial must develop after granting bail to an
accused, for its cancellation by a superior court, bail, can
also be revoked by a superior court, when the previous
court granting bail has ignored relevant material available
on record, gravity of the offence or its societal impact. It was
thus observed:--
Daulat Ram vs The State Of Haryana on 11 August, 1972
"9. ...... Conventionally, there can be supervening
circumstances which may develop post the grant of bail
and are non conducive to fair trial, making it necessary to
cancel the bail. This Court in Daulat Ram v. State of
Haryana observed that:
Prakash Kadam & Etc. Etc vs Ramprasad Vishwanath Gupta & Anr on 13 May, 2011
16. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Prakash Kadam v. Ramprasad
Vishwanath Gupta3, held that even without misuse, bail can be cancelled
for grave allegations if the lower court ignored material.
1