Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.38 seconds)Section 299 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Surinder Kumar vs Union Territory, Chandigarh on 8 March, 1989
1. Surinder Kumar v. Union Territory,
Chandigarh (1989(2) SCC 217)(knife used)
Byvarapu Raju vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Anr on 28 May, 2007
3. Byvarapu Raju v. State of A.P. and another (2007
(11)SCC 218) (hacked with a Yerukalakatti)
Sukhbir Singh vs State Of Haryana on 20 February, 2002
30. The next question is whether the accused acted in a
cruel or unusual manner. For the offence to fall under Section
300 IPC, the ingredients of Section 300 IPC will have to be
satisfied. Fatal injuries must have been inflicted before a case
falls within the sweep of Section 300 IPC. Merely because
serious injuries are inflicted, it cannot be lightly concluded that
Crl.Appeal No.668/06 -27-
the offender had acted in a cruel or unusual manner. Every act
which causes death and which falls under Section 300 IPC can
in one sense of the term be described to be cruel or unusual.
Obviously, the expression 'cruel or unusual manner' is not used
in that very ordinary sense in Exception 4. Precedents have
been cited before us to show that the benefit of Exception 4 has
been conceded to the accused notwithstanding the infliction of
serious injuries on the accused. The learned counsel for the
appellant relies on paragraph 19 of the decision in Sukhbir
Singh (supra) to contend that the fact that the injuries suffered
were fatal injuries is not sufficient to exclude the application of
Exception 4. We extract paragraph 19 below:
1