Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.61 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Mahesh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 August, 1996
In Mahesh v. State of M.P., (1996) 10 SCC
668,where the appellant had assaulted the deceased in
12
a sudden fight and after giving him one blow he had
not caused any further injury to the deceased which
fact situation was held by this Court to be sufficient to
bring the case under Exception 4 to Section 300 of
IPC. This Court held:
Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad vs State Of Maharashtra on 3 May, 2013
15. The law laid down in the aforesaid cases was
considered and applied recently by this Court in the
case reported in Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad vs. State of
Maharashtra, (2013) 6 SCC 770. In this case also, the
appellant-accused while passing on the field of the
deceased on a spur of moment indulged in heated talk
with the deceased which resulted in hitting a blow by
the appellantaccused to the deceased with the rod
causing death of the deceased. Justice T. S. Thakur,
speaking for the Bench, accepted the plea raised by
the appellant-accused and accordingly altered the
sentence falling under Section 304 Part II IPC by
giving him the benefit of Exception 4 of Section 300
IPC. It was held by this Court as under:
Raj Pal Singh vs Commissioner Of Income Tax Haryana on 25 August, 2020
In this regard, the judgment passed by Hon'ble the Apex Court in
the case of Raj Singh Vs. State of Haryana reported in (2000) 10 SCC
151 can be relied upon, wherein the accused was awarded the sentence
already undergone by him.
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
K. Ravi Kumar vs State Of Karnataka on 28 November, 2014
9. Before we turn to the facts of this case, it is
apposite to take note of the principle of law laid down
by this Court as to in which circumstances, the
accused is held entitled to claim the benefit of
Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC thereby is entitled to
seek conversion of the offence committed by him
from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to
murder. Indeed, the principle of law on this issue
remains no longer res integra and settled by a series
of decisions of this Court. What has varied is its
application to every case.