Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.50 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
Article 17 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh vs Randhir Singh & Ors on 29 March, 2010
23. The contention of the appellant that the suit of
the plaintiff is not maintainable without seeking necessary
declaration is unsustainable in light of the judgment of the
Apex Court in the case of Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh
vs. Randhir Singh & others [AIR 2010 SC 2807], wherein
it is held as under:
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Ganapati Santaram Bhosale And Anr. vs Ramachandra Subbarao Kulkarni And Ors. on 12 February, 1985
24. A similar view is taken by the Division Bench
of this Court in the case of Ganapati Santaram Bhosale
Vs. Ramachandra Subbarao Kulkarni [ILR 1985 KAR
1115], wherein it has been held as under:
Rajendra Babugouda Patil Ors vs Rajeshwari W/O Bhimanagouda Patil Ors on 18 January, 2012
In support of his contention, learned counsel relied
upon the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court
in the case of Sadashiv S/o. Balagauda Patil vs.
Rajeshwari [RSA.No.100498/2014 disposed on
22.092015] (Sadashiv) and Shri. Baddeppa vs. Shri.
hanmukhappa [MSA.No.100119/2019 disposed on
10.08.2021] (Baddeppa).
1