Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
K.Gomathpushan vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By on 20 February, 2014 cites

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

"The Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnatak Vs. Umadevi (3) and other reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1 has held that regularization cannot be a method of recruitment unless the petitioner has the case for absorption. As per the orders of the Government, in the Original Application (Later converted in to the Writ Petition) the relief claimed by the petitioner cannot be countenanced by this Court. Hence, the Writ Petition stands dismissed."
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 4959 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

Management Of Dandakaranya Project, ... vs Workmen Through Rehabilitation ... on 7 January, 1997

12. A daily wage earner is a ' workman'. Further a 'casual worker' is also the workman. It is to be noted that unless the employee is recruited at a temporary basis against a sanctioned post, the issue of regularising his services may not arise. Also that NMR workers would not be regularised, but they would get compensation on closure as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court the Management of Danda Karunya Project, Koreput v. Workmen through Rehabilitation Employee Union AIR 1997 SC 852.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 12 - S C Agrawal - Full Document
1