Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.23 seconds)

Harijan Magha Jesha vs State Of Gujarat on 7 March, 1979

In Harijan Megha Jesha v. State of Gujarat , and Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra , it has been held that the circumstance which was not put to the accused while recording his plea, cannot be used against him. Therefore, the findings of the learned trial Judge to the effect that the house where the alleged crime was committed and the room from where the dead body of Ganga Ram alongwith pair of blood stained shoes were recovered belonged to the appellant is perverse and not based on any legal evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 65 - S M Ali - Full Document

Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984

In Harijan Megha Jesha v. State of Gujarat , and Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra , it has been held that the circumstance which was not put to the accused while recording his plea, cannot be used against him. Therefore, the findings of the learned trial Judge to the effect that the house where the alleged crime was committed and the room from where the dead body of Ganga Ram alongwith pair of blood stained shoes were recovered belonged to the appellant is perverse and not based on any legal evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 3286 - Full Document
1   2 Next