Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.18 seconds)

T.K. Mohammed Abubucker(D)Thr.Lrs.& ... vs P.S.M. Ahamed Abdul Khader & Ors on 22 April, 2009

NC: 2023:KHC:42552 RSA No. 1186 of 2007 He further submits that though the registered gift deed was executed, but under Section 128 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, it is the duty of the registering authority to inform the revenue authorities about the rights acquired by Thimmaiah and Ningamma. Further, the plaintiff has not challenged the registered gift deed executed by his father in favour of Thimmaiah and Ningamma. He submits that the plaintiff has to establish his case independently, but cannot depend upon the weakness of the defendant's case. He submits that both the courts below considering the weakness of the defendants, have passed the impugned judgments. In support of his argument, he has relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of T.K.MOHAMMED ABUBUCKER (D) THRO. LRS. & ORS. VS. P.S.M.AHAMED ABDUL KHADER & ORS., reported in AIR 2009 SC 2966 and on the judgment of this Court in the case of K. GOPALA REDDY & ORS. VS. SURYANARAYANA & ORS., reported in (2004) 1 KCCR 662. He further submits that the suit filed by the plaintiff is barred by limitation. The
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 48 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next